Our experience in the process of managing construction adjudication has developed since the enactment of the Scheme for construction contracts in 1998 and the subsequent ‘new Scheme’ changes made in October 2011.
Emphasis should be made between the statutory adjudication process defined by the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (with subsequent amendments by the Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009) and contractual adjudication defined by clauses in a contract but in essence either route must adhere to some fundamental rules.
The crucial fact to note is that even if there is no contractual mechanism for adjudication statutory adjudication may still be an option and so however the construction contract was formed, even if by oral contract, it is worthwhile discussing the facts with us to define the options.
Adjudication comprises a sequence of Notices, Referral, Response and further exchanges of what are in effect claims and defences. The timing and content of each document is critical, mainly due to the powers given to an adjudicator.
Certain binding powers given to an adjudicator mean that a decision can only be based on the initial points raised in the Notice, a decision must be reached with strict time periods, often 28 days, and that a decision is binding on the parties.
By way of example extracts from the 1996 Act show the process which must be followed:
1. Any party to a construction contract (the “referring party”) may give written notice (the “notice of adjudication”) of his intention to refer any dispute arising under the contract, to adjudication.
2. The notice of adjudication shall be given to every other party to the contract.
3. The notice of adjudication shall set out briefly:
Referral Notices must then state details of the dispute.
12. The adjudicator shall:
19. – (1) The adjudicator shall reach his decision not later than:
20. The adjudicator shall decide the matters in dispute. He may take into account any other matters which the parties to the dispute agree should be within the scope of the adjudication or which are matters under the contract which he considers are necessarily connected with the dispute. In particular, he may:
23. – (1) In his decision, the adjudicator may, if he thinks fit, order any of the parties to comply peremptorily with his decision or any part of it.
In summary, recent amendments to the 1996 Act mean that:
Also it is essential to appreciate the strategic and somewhat tactical approach by others which potentially results in a missed opportunity to sufficiently present the facts, and for that to only be due to a procedural advantage gained by an opposing party.
Copyright 2025 @ Templar Consultants